Brisbane office(07) 3180 0150
Gold Coast office(07) 5529 8803
Home >  Blog >  Do Not Engage in Misleading and Deceptive Conduct: Lessons from the DG Institute Case

Do Not Engage in Misleading and Deceptive Conduct: Lessons from the DG Institute Case

Posted by Elizabeth Gore-Jones on 16 April 2024

In the recent DG Institute case, the Federal Court delivered a stern warning to businesses about the consequences of misleading and deceptive conduct, when Master Wealth Control Pty Ltd, trading as DG Institute, and its Director Dominque Grubisa were found to have breached the Australian Consumer Law by making false or misleading representations in the promotion and sale of their education programs.

Between April 2017 and November 2022, DG Institute marketed two programs, Real Estate Rescue (RER) and Master Wealth Control (MWC), attracting over 3000 students who paid significant fees ranging from $4,500 to $9,200 each. However, the Court ruled that the representations made by DG Institute about these programs were false or misleading, leading to dissatisfaction among students and sparking regulatory action by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).

Specifically, the Court identified several false claims made by DG Institute, including promises regarding the effectiveness of certain asset protection strategies and misrepresentations about legal precedents.

The Court also found that Grubisa was knowingly involved in the company's deceptive practices, having played a pivotal role in crafting, approving, and disseminating false and misleading information through promotional materials and program content.

ACCC Commissioner Liza Carver emphasized the importance of truthfulness in business communications, stating, "This case is another reminder that businesses must ensure statements they make when promoting products or services to consumers are accurate and not misleading."

She added, “It should also serve as a strong reminder to company directors that they may be held liable for their involvement in false or misleading representations made by the company in breach of the Australian Consumer Law.”

As the legal proceedings continue, the ACCC seeks injunctions, penalties, consumer redress, costs and even disqualification of Grubisa from managing corporations.

This case serves as a clear signal to business owners about the severe consequences of engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct and highlights the need for diligence and transparency in all business dealings.

Looking for legal guidance to ensure your business practices comply with the law? Our team is dedicated to helping businesses navigate complex legal challenges and safeguard their reputation and integrity. Do not let misleading and deceptive conduct jeopardize your business's success. Contact us for expert advice and support.

Author:Elizabeth Gore-Jones
About: Elizabeth specialises in franchising law. She lectures at Bond University PLA in franchising, she sits on the Queensland Law Society Franchising Committee, she is a past member of the Women in Franchising committee and a past member of the Franchise Council of Australia.
Connect via:TwitterLinkedIn
Tags:BusinessNewsFranchiseeFranchisor

latest news

Congratulations, Elizabeth!

May 02 2024
Exciting news!  Elizabeth Gore-Jones, our principal at The Franchise & Business Lawyers, has just been appointed as the Deputy Chair for the Queensland Law Society Franchising Law Committee. Our team is immensely proud of her dedication...

Quick Question?

Liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation

Brisbane Office Address: Clarence Chambers,
Level 10, 95 North Quay,
Brisbane QLD 4000

Gold Coast Office Address: Wyndham Corporate Centre
Level 9, 1 Corporate Court
Bundall QLD 4217

Central Post Office Box Address: P.O. Box 428
Oxenford, QLD 4210